RANT STARTS HERE

CSS-Discuss is probably the most prolific mailing list when it comes to Web design and cascading style sheets (CSS) in particular. It is a broad group with high traffic of messages circulation. I subscribed to it earlier this year due to admiration for Eric Meyer — possibly the man behind this mailing list and the man to provide us with a Web-based presentation tool better known as S5.

[CSSD] avoids off -topic discussions like general (X)HTML, accessibility and particular Web-related applications. However, I am put back by the dull, useless, non-reusable discussions in that group. Much of the conversation traffic gets ‘wasted’ on cross-platform site checks and dealing with known browser bugs (rather than CSS as a standard). Almost every single day one would see entire threads about rendering of pages in different browsers — something along the lines of this fictitious paragraph:

In IE, the border is drawn one pixel above that which I see in FF so if I look closely enough I can see some small speckles in my menu. Having said that, it only becomes visible if I use this particular arcane browser.

To sum up, my final advice is to avoid this mailing list unless it resides on a separate E-mail account. It might be relevant if you wish to discuss bugs attributed to browser developers or if you want to wind up opening various Web sites in different computers and occasionally giving a nod to the OP, which acknowledges acceptable page rendering.

RANT ENDS HERE

uto-responders, also referred to as “vacation messages”, are a valuable feature of E-mail accounts. These are not only helpful when an account gets checked irregularly, but also when it becomes deprecated.

Auto-responders can be invoked by the E-mail client (e.g. recent versions of Outlook), but they require the computer to remain switched on. This, in fact, is the big con: the method unnecessarily consumes electricity in cases of an actual vacation. The computer needs to stay on for days or weeks at a time. Messages can be checked upon return, assuming the computer has not crash beforehand.

Alternatively, autoresponders can be handled at server level. It is worth noting that this will not always be a supported feature, especially when you do not have ownership of your E-mail address’ domain. The exception are Web-based mailing systems that support the feature fully, e.g. Yahoo Mail and CommuniGate Pro.

There is an ad-hoc alternative to autoresponders, which I adopted since I was able to set up a mail forwarder, but not an autoresponder.

• Set up a forwarder to a meaningful but non-existent E-mail address, e.g. I_am_away_at_the_moment@no.domain or This_account_has_been_intentionally_terminated@no.domain.
• Since the account you forward mail to resides on an address that does not exist, the message will bounce, though often not immediately.
• Subsequently, a delivery error will reach the original sender. Budging by the odd E-mail address that triggered an error, the message sender will receive information regarding the situation rather than assume that the recipient stayed silent.

To sum things up, forwarders to made-up addresses can guarantee that in the absence of auto-responders, all correspondents will receive meaningful feedback.

Certain ever-lasting trends in society worry me. While there is less smiling and degradation in terms of affectionate social patterns, anywhere you turn you see excessive compulsive laughter (often in public places over the telephone) as well as fake, polite laughs. [that's my genuine laugh on the right, circa 1984] Fake laughter has become a fundamental asset to girls who flirt. A man might say the darnest thing and some girls would still voluntarily giggle. Guys likewise, but as a straight man, I have no evidence. Either way, this fabricated temperament is becoming a norm.

It is also possible to see this wave of fake laughter in today’s sit-coms with a live studio audience. I don’t know about the old TV series , but the new batch of Hollywood Squares (with Whoopie), for example, bothered me quite a bit. Involved are 9 celebrities who memorise one-liners off paper, 2 contestants saying “true” or “false”, and an audience that hysterically laughs at jokes written by comedians prior to the show. In America, you would sometimes spot a guy with a large banner facing the audience and encouraging them to laugh or applaud. I used to watch such shows when there was nothing else on TV. Maturity has taught me the low educational value contained within them. We have to realise that if a joke is not forcibly laughed at, it does not imply that we have failed to understand it. One who does not laugh is not necessarily a boor.

To sum up, my bottom line would be that staged behaviour on TV hit our lives too. Most of us are living behind masks, hiding our real feelings and manipulating natural emotion to achieve our goals or adhere to norms. I am hoping for greater openness in society one day. Fake laughter is relatively benign, if not beneficial, commonplace behaviour. The new wave of utter disrespect, distance and cold, emotionless attitude is a far greater danger as manners and flattery are still the glue of society.

A friend sent me this mischievous E-mail which explains how to avoid stopping at any intermediate floors when using an elevator.

Many elevators include a hidden feature that puts them into “Express” mode, which will take the car to the floor of your choice without stopping at any other floors. When you enter the elevator, press the “door close” button and your floor button at the exact same time. For most elevators, this will automatically activate the “Express” mode. Some elevators require a key to activate the mode, and in some the option has been turned off by the elevator’s owners. But elevators the trick usually works on include:

• Otis Elevators (Except those made in 1992)
• Some Dover Elevators
• Most Desert Elevators

Don’t tell too many people about this, as it will stop working for all of us.

I sure hope it does not trigger red lights somewhere as I have never tried it before. Spreading the word is something I could not resist doing. Just remember not to give me (or my friend) any credit for this; it is not something to take pride in. As a final clarification, I have never tried it, neither will I ever be tempted to. It is a nice trick to be aware of nonetheless.

Maybe purely by mistake, or maybe intentionally so, Wikipedia Stats pages are available for public viewing.

Interesting figures to notice:

• Internet Explorer’s share among Wikipedia users/visitors is 70% (it gets around 52% on schestowitz.com)
• Referrals by search engines:
  • Google: 3082040
  • Yahoo: 1156329
  • MSN: 263755

This implies that certain search engines favour Wikipedia more than others (judge for yourself). It also suggests that Firefox users tend to like Wikipedia more than Internet Explorer users.

BEGIN LOOP

END

Back to beginning of loop

Inspired by the children’s book “Zoom”

definitely enjoy running my Web log, but Dvorak points out a very intersting mock-up pamphlet that most bloggers would strongly relate to. That pamphlet talks, in a more or less sarcastic fashion, about notions like content anxiety (subconsciously wishing to post any piece of information read) and pressure (to add new content to the blog/s). If you ever feel like blogging has a negative effect on your life, be sure to follow the link.

Also see: Internet Anxiety Disorder Anyone?