Suppressed, as usual.

T is not some ‘crank’ saying it. This video covers recent articles:

Full description, as Google loves censoring such videos.

Professor Angus Dalgleish, mRNA Vaccines Must Be Banned Once and For All

dailysceptic.org/2023/10/01/mrna-vaccines-must-be-…

www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-…

At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection).

The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since.

Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the U.S.

After boosters

The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of:

After boosters

Lymphomas, a cancer of the lymphatic system

Leukaemias, a group of cancers that affect the blood

Kidney cancers

My colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere).

Those of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratory

The ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promised

Batch-to-batch variability

These alarming concerns seem to have been brushed off by the regulators when they should have immediately begun investigating them in depth.

Yellow Card and U.S. VAERS adverse event reports to be nothing to be worried about.

DNA contamination

So why are these cancers occurring?

T cell suppression was my first likely explanation.

However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development,

Reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes.

To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence.

No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.

Eurostat

Circulatory diseases, cancer: 54% of all EU deaths in 2021

ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-new…

In 2021 there were 5.3 million deaths in the EU

Circulatory diseases, 1.71 million (32% of all deaths).

Cancer, 1.14 million (22%).

Respiratory diseases (0.32 million; 6%)

Diseases of the digestive system (0.21 million; 4%)

Eurostat, Excess deaths 2022

ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-…

April, + 12%
May, +7%
June, +7%
July, + 16%

Eurostat, 2023

ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w…

Excess mortality continued

Eurostat, Jan 2024, + 3.6%

In January 2024, the highest excess mortality rates were in the Netherlands (15.3 %), Denmark (11.5 %) and Germany (9.9 %).

In January 2024, excess mortality continued to vary across the EU.

Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Croatia, Luxembourg, Slovakia, Poland, Latvia and Czechia recorded no excess deaths.

ALREADY said — some time at the start of the year — that it looked like ONS had sacked or reassigned the people who were publishing mortality data for England and Wales. New names appeared, now it’s just some generic “Data Insights and Data Science team”, and a professor who specialises in this field recently warned about falsified data. Is the following data complete?

Why are the names of the people behind this data (I corresponded with some before) suddenly hidden?

r. John Campbell isn’t make this up. Watch this. New and damning evidence, published today:

N today’s channel of Dr. John Campbell there’s a new video that speaks of “Excess deaths, MPs request data” (in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines, too).

And here is the description in case Google censors him again.

Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’

Tweet from Andrew Bridgen with the letter in full

twitter.com/ABridgen

Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’
MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/02/health-secreta…

MPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths

A cross-party group

“growing public and professional concerns” UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020

Demand to be shown the underlying data for to support the Government’s assertion, “no evidence” linking excess deaths to the vaccines for Covid-19.

21 MPs and peers

“If those data do indeed exist, please share them; if thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports,”

“There is no place here for blind faith.”

Written to

Health Secretary

Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)

Potentially critical data, which maps the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths,

have been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.

Data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.

“Questions about these trends, however, have to date been met by a relative wall of silence from your organisations and other public health officials.”

A DHSC spokesman

“We are committed to data transparency and publish a wide range of data on excess mortality. The datasets published are kept under constant review.”

New video:

Description in case Google removes his videos again:

We feel compelled to conclude that the MHRA has indeed become an enabler for the pharmaceutical industry, with patient safety no longer being its primary concern.

Medicines regulator failed to flag Covid vaccine side effects,

and must be urgently investigated.

All-party parliamentary group, (APPG) on Pandemic Response and Recovery,

believe MHRA were aware of heart and clotting issues,

in February 2021,

but did not highlight the problems for several months

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/27/mhra-covid-vac…

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/05/esther-mcvey-c…

www.medscape.co.uk/viewarticle/uk-medicines-regula…\

appgpandemic.org/news/mhra-letter-health-select-co…

We write regarding serious concerns about the approach of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),

to patient safety and also problems in a system that,

far from protecting patients,

continues to put them at serious risk.

Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh

We also believe that the MHRA is at the heart of these far wider endemic failings,

and that those cited in this letter merely represent the tip of a sizeable iceberg of failure.
The Yellow Card Scheme

The Yellow Card Scheme … is failing patients.

Hospital admissions are caused or complicated by ADRs (16.5%),

while analysis of in patient stays has shown that 15% of patients experience one or more ADRs, with half being either definitely or possibly avoidable.

Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review Review, report First Do No Harm:

We heard about a system that cannot be relied upon to identify promptly significant adverse outcomes arising from a medication or device,

it is clear that there is gross under-reporting,

and our complaints systems are both too complex and too diffuse to allow early signal detection.

Under-reporting hinders the ability to detect signals and assign causation.

The cost to patient safety of such an unreliable system can be measured in the needless fatalities,

the considerable burden on the quality of life for survivors,

and a £2.2 billion strain on NHS England alone.

Only one in 12 patients are aware that they can report a suspected ADR.

A 2006 systemic review

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/

The rate of under-reporting of adverse events was, on average, 94% and possibly as high as 98%,

meaning possibly only two in every 100 ADRs were reported to the MHRA.

For example, a survey of UK pharmacists suggested they lack interest in, and do not promote, direct patient reporting.

Only 19% of the respondents displayed a poster promoting the Yellow Card Scheme in their pharmacy.

2023, analysis of anticoagulants

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37269441/

Reporting of gastrointestinal bleeds

North West of England Hospital Trust recorded 12,013 bleed-related emergency admissions.

Of these, 1,058 were taking DOAC anticoagulants.

Only six DOAC Yellow Card reports (0.56% of the possible) were made by the Trust during the period.

Conflicts of Interest and Transparency

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?

www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538

The regulator-industry revolving door

Proportion of covid-19 vaccine committee members that declared financial COIs

UK, HMRA, 32%

Australia, TGA, 50%

March 2022, Dame June Raine, Chief Executive of the MHRA

agency’s transition from “the watchdog to the enabler”

does little to quell suspicions of conflicts and the implications for patient safety and cannot be overlooked.

MHRA’s responses to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.

Between 2008 and 2017,

only 41% of requests were successful.

Since 2019, the number of requests has seen a substantial increase from 609 to 1,609 in 2021,

likely due to concerns about the regulation of Covid-19 vaccinations,

with 76% of these requests answered outside the 20 working days statutory response time.

Often exemptions were applied or vague or evasive responses were received.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

from regulatory approval to post marketing pharmacovigilance the MHRA has a history of failing patients

The MHRA does not attempt to assess or compare the safety of different vaccines, due to inadequate reporting in the system which prevents any analysis:

MHRA “does not hold a process for the investigation and follow up of individual Yellow Card reports”

MHRA only followed up some 54% of deaths reported in yellow cards as possibly linked to exposure to one of the Covid-19 vaccines.

What conclusions are we to draw about the seeming unwillingness of a regulator, largely funded by those it regulates, to disclose data to the same public it professes to protect?

wrote about it last month.

Recent:

2024: A Year of COVID-19 Cover-up (Massive Mortality Levels Persist, Even Now)

2024 Looks Like Another Year of 50,000+ Excess Deaths Across the UK

New:

Description and links:

Massive APPARENT reduction in excess deaths in 2023 as UK ONS change how they calculate excess deaths.

www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/health…

OECD, UK

stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676

Excess deaths in 2022, 52,514 (9.26%)

OECD, UK, weeks 1 – 44, 2023

Excess deaths, 49,389 (9.44%)

www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-for-hea…

app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS0…

Early heart disease deaths rise to 14-year high

www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-a…

Over 100,000 excess deaths involving cardiovascular conditions in England since February 2020

Heart and circulatory diseases cause around a quarter of all deaths in England – over 140,000 deaths each year or one death every four minutes.

In 2022

Over 39,000 people in England died prematurely of cardiovascular conditions,

heart attacks, coronary heart disease and stroke,

an average of 750 people each week.

It is the highest annual total since 2008.