The word on the street is that Microsoft’s CEO, Steve Ballmer, has lost a lot of weight recently. Perhaps he cannot sleep at night either, or perhaps, even more possibly, he is simply on a diet. I prefer to believe that he lost his appetite once he fully comprehended the fierce competition, which he reluctantly admitted to in a very recent interview on innovation (video in Windows-only WMV format, so see cocky comments instead). Microsoft have plenty of reasons to worry:

• Internet domination – Firefox and Google are slowly taking control of the Net. Software migrates to the Web and becomes more inter-operable. This by all means accumulates to more bad news to Microsoft.
• Mac and Tiger – Scoble of Microsoft has admitted that Mac OS is ahead of Window in terms of its capabilities. Eye candy is not the only advantage Apple have to offer.
• Security – Windows is still unable to cope with the many security flaws and viruses. The industry is getting fed up.
• Breaking proprietary – Samba has opened up network protocols, allowing file and printer sharing to be compatible with non-Windows operating systems and work in tandem. Open Office makes popular Windows formats readable under most platforms and continues to improve dramatically.
• Productivity and innovation – Longhorn offers only mere gains as all “three pillars” were conceded due to self-imposed time constraints.
• Open Source – Linux, being a source of free software substitutes, has become one of Microsoft’s biggest fears. It has gracefully been adopted recently. Michael Dell has given $100,000,000 to RedHat Linux and Fijitsu carry on with Linux, to name just a few examples that came up lately.

Bill Gates posing for a teen magazine in 1985
with a Mac at the back, from which he nicked the GUI

istory certainly repeats itself. Microsoft have once again imitated the user interface of the Mac, particularly the eye candy; their beta version clearly reflects on that. This beta was only announced a day or two ago, so the leakage of screenshots was rather quick.

Also worth noticing is the stunning similarity to Windows XP, not to mention the absence of improved essence underneath, namely the three promised pillars, which were conceded due to self-imposed time constraints.

Top-left: The older days of Apple who have recently sidled next to Intel; Top-right: So-called Microsoft’s Hardware Department; Bottom: Screen-shot of Metisse for FVWM (*NIX)

A very unusual story comes from eWEEK. Microsoft have apparently demonstrated Linux to their audience.

While the answer is unclear, Microsoft Corp. surprised many of the attendees at its annual worldwide partner show here this weekend by allowing a third party to present a “hands-on lab” that allowed attendees to play with a range of Linux desktop software…

…the lab let attendees, many of whom were not familiar with Linux, experiment with KDE (K Desktop Environment) as well as see the Apache Web server in action…

Quite frankly, I consider this to be yet another attempt at being cocky. It was not too long ago that Microsoft paid one of the most popular bloggers in the world to evangelise their company and software products. They also scheme to adopt a large group of bloggers who will preach about Microsoft ‘goodness’. Biassed journalism — now isn’t that something that Microsoft can buy? I also wonder if they demonstrated Linux on some antiquated Debian distribution.

here comes a time in the lifecycle of an application when reliable and non-lossy export facilities need to be implemented. Unfortunately, ego of developers sometimes leads to good import facilities while there is only limited or no support for export of user data. Del.icio.us are one example which was previously mentioned. Another such example is Microsoft Outlook et al. Microsoft are reluctant to allow easy data export, which implies no trivial escape from proprietary. Thunderbird, however, does a terrific job importing all data (mail and settings) from Outlook or Outlook Express. OpenOffice.org acts upon Microsoft Office proprietary reasonably well too.

WordPress are currently working on export facilities that simplify and bridge the gap between the administration panel (application) and the data (SQL). It is wonderful to see export facilities realised, which demonstrates no ego among the software developers. This allows users to ‘dance’ between platforms at will. There is always a certain feeling of freedom knowing that taking on one certain application cannot result in a vendor lock-in.

ood news have just arrived: the EU has rejected, with a crushing majority, the software patent bill.

The Register states:

The European Parliament has voted by a massive majority to reject the software patents directive, formally known as the Directive on the Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions. The vote to scrap the bill was passed by a margin of 648 votes to 14, with 18 abstentions.

Some outrageously simple algorithms have recently been filed as patents. More notably:

• Microsoft filing a patent for address book encapsulated objects (i.e. more proprietary)
• Amazon with the ‘one-click shopping’
• Leaving the best for last: Amazon patenting the recommendation of books based on pages previously viewed

Luckily, such insanity is unlikely to invade Europe.

PC World, with a site powered by Windows (ASP implies so), have published a Preview of Longhorn’s latest beta alpha version. Their key line is as follows:

The newest versions of the next Windows add graphics sizzle and more search features but lack visible productivity enhancements.

Also in this review:

Over the last several years, Microsoft has touted Longhorn’s trio of significant innovations: a graphics engine dubbed Avalon; a technology called Indigo that enables programs on different computers or devices to communicate; and an indexed, searchable data storage layer called WinFS. But when faced with a self-imposed release deadline of late 2006, Microsoft decided last year to pull WinFS out of Longhorn, promising to release that component as an add-on at a later date.

Related item: Longhorn: A Trainwreck?

Video formats are among the most complicated formats to handle. Decoding and encoding of a frame sequence is an intricate process that different manufacturers take a different approach to solving. One solution is to settle down for no compression, the other being imposition of standards. There is one body, namely Microsoft among a few more, that embeds elements which are never agreed upon in the IT community. This corruption of inter-operable formats includes documents, spreadsheets, mail and even Web pages. Norway has had enough of that.

I would argue that there is no reason to get bitter. No open format, no view. I was never a huge TV/video anyway. When Microsoft change the encoding of text or textual formats, that descends to an entire new level though.