Help the search engines clean up the Web.
Report duplicates.

recently mentioned site scrapers in the context of Internet plagiarism. More often do I hear about blogs copied systematically nowadays.

Blog plagiarism is a growing phenomenon, or so it seems on the surface. This even happens to me sometimes, but I refuse to spend my time or lose sleep over it. The process needed to remove stolen content is unnecessarily cumbersome. As as example, Podz and Mike Little, who are both WordPress developers, had people copy their entire site merely post-by-post. This can ultimately lead to mirror/duplicate penalties, which deter search engines. As far as I know, they had to engage in a lengthy process of correspondence before action was taken. The best one can do is keep an eye on the dodgy sites and report abuse when all blows out of proportion. As long as a site is public, it is susceptible to copyright infringement and can, in due time, become a victim.

As one example of stolen content, RSS Site Map is one such item that was once copied verbatim and in full. If I recall correctly, a Blogger member was the culprit. A subtle link was at least there, but no real attribution was made.

Other content thieves scrape random bits and stick them together to form ‘doorway pages’. These pages serve as a mechanism which hogs search engine referrals. It is one among many popular aspects of black-hat SEO practices, which are a form of spam by any definition.

Frequently-Asked Questions (or Useful Facts)

• Q: How does one copy content systematically?
  A: RSSBlog [rel="nofollow"] and the like. Magpie can do this vis RSS when misused.
• Q: How does one detect plagiarism?
  A: Tools such as Copyscape appear to do that trick. I imagine that they run a series of Web searches with large sentences involved. They then attempt to identify excessive overlap across sites on the Internet. These Web-based tools simplify and automate, at an upper-level at least, an old-styled method for detection of duplicates. This type of technique I can still recall from my days as an undergraduate.
• Q: How does one report plagiarism?
  A: Probably the most suitable response is contacting the host of the offending site. Examples are needed to support the complaint/s.

EVERAL days ago, in the context of ‘housekeeping’ computer chores, I stressed the need to manage paper references in an appropriate application. At the time I mentioned JabRef, which is a Java references management program. I have had JabRef installed for quite a while, but did not bother to accommodate it with data.

Knowing the limitation of workstation-bound software, I decided to go ‘shopping’ for a Web-based alternative. I have many such applications installed on my Webspace, so I know their powers. I also know that I can take advantage of remote access, but it can be slow (especially while on vacation), cumbersome, and only loosely inter-operable. JabRef is cross-platform, but installation on each desktop is still a requirement, which is less than desirable.

My pursuit for a Web-based program was very fruitful. I found only one application of the type I had sought. Freshmeat (which is suitable to vegetarians too!) had me aware of PHPBibMan (PHP Bibliography Manager). Here is my own description of PHPBibMan. It is based on what I have been able to gather after a few minutes of exploration:

• PHP/MySQL
• Open Source
• Free, apparently GPL
• Rich graphical interface
• Multiple users, multiple groups
• BibTeX import and BibTeX output (albeit import is not very reliable)
• High level of complexity (over 500 files), plenty of functionality

PHPBibMan is finally installed on my site alongside similar applications, the latest of which is for spreadsheets. So far I like what I see, but the documentation (installation instructions in particular) are poor. There is plenty of potential for PHPBibMan, but merely nonexistent documentation had me digging the files and experimenting before actual success. The projects looks as thought it ceases to be actively maintained last year.