Wednesday, October 7th, 2026, 6:53 pm
Litigation Update
Filed under: 
t is a matter of public record (as of today) that another Order was issued. It was issued by the joint head of the media and communications list at the UK’s High Court. As is already known to the opposing party, we’re not unrepresented in the case because of Legal Aid and pro bono advice from a “leading specialist in defamation, privacy, and data protection law.”
We are not fearful of the Court (but we do respect it) because we had done no wrong by opposing merciless attacks on women, on Computer Science, and on computer security. I did no wrong by protecting my wife from online abuse and by protecting women in America from physical abuse in America. The other side is wasting obscene amounts of money trying to project in absentia. The aim is to distract from their own horrific actions and make it sound like the real culprit is the person who wrote about the actions.
It’s not naive to have faith and genuine belief that at the end justice will be served, not weaponised.
