New video:

Description:

In 2022, 7.8% more young adults died than in 2019, this is outrageous and demands an official (credible) explanation

https://actuaries.org.uk/news-and-media-releases/news-articles/2023/jan/17-january-23-cmi-says-2022-had-the-worst-second-half-for-mortality-since-2010/

Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) is publishing frequent UK mortality analysis

Today’s updates cover week 1 of 2023 (to 6 January)

Mortality for 2022 as a whole was 4.5% higher than 2019,

but 7.8% lower than in 2020

2.2% lower than in 2021

There is a striking difference in how mortality rates in 2022 compare to 2019 at different ages

2.5% higher for ages 75-84

7.8% higher for ages 20-44

In the UK, there have been around 155,300 more deaths from all causes than expected from the start of the pandemic to 6 January 2023

Of these

72,900 occurred in 2020

47,500 in 2021

31,000 in 2022

In the UK, the second half of 2022

26,300 excess deaths,

compared to 4,700 in the first half of 2022

The number of deaths registered in England & Wales in week 1 of 2023

3,437 higher than if mortality rates had been the same as in week 1 of 2019;

equivalent to 30% more deaths than expected

Cobus Daneel, Chair of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee

Although weekly excess mortality in the second half of 2022 wasn’t nearly as high as the peaks earlier in the pandemic, it was persistent.

This led to more excess deaths in the second half of 2022 than in the second half of any year since 2010.

Excess mortality has been particularly high recently with more than 7,000 excess deaths over the three weeks to 6 January 2023.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/davos-2023-pfizer-ceo-evades-questions-on-covid-vaccine-efficacy-watch-video-101674203439039.html

Albert Bourla, Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer

World Economic Forum meeting

Series of tough questions about the efficacy Covid vaccine

Thank you very much

Have a nice day

India, minister for state for information and technology. Rajeev Chandrasekhar

Just to remind all Indians, that Pfizer tried to bully Govt of India into accepting conditions of indemnity

2nd December 2020

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html

The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued,

enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.

16th December 2020

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-vaccines-idUSKBN28Q014

Britain to spend £3.7 billion on vaccines and bear liability, watchdog says

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain has agreed to spend 3.7 billion pounds on COVID-19 vaccines and in most cases will bear the liability if claims are made against the pharmaceutical firms involved, the National Audit Office (NAO) said on Wednesday.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-4-january-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-covid-19-vaccine-liability-foi-20-532

I would like to know what the indemnity/ liability clauses are with the vaccine that is to be rolled out this month.

Furthermore I would also like to know who is liable for any adverse side effects that occur.

The MHRA holds no information on this. We recommend that you contact NHS England for this information,

I would also like to know why Pfizer and the NHS staff administering the doses required full indemnity?

The MHRA holds no information on this. We recommend that you contact NHS England for this information,

New video:

Description:

CDC & FDA Identify Preliminary COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signal for Persons Aged 65 Years and Older

edition.cnn.com/2023/01/13/health/pfizer-bivalent-…

www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/…

Transparency and vaccine safety are top priorities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent

CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)

met the statistical criteria to prompt additional investigation into whether there was a safety concern for ischemic stroke in people ages 65 and older

More likely to have an ischemic stroke in the 21 days following vaccination,

compared with days 22-42 following vaccination.

Group 1

Vaccine day to day 21 (more likely to have stroke)

Group 2

Day 21 to day 42 (less likely to have stroke)

No quantitative data is given

They then give lots of reasons this is not a valid signal

Therefore,

No change in vaccination practice is recommended

CDC continues to recommend that everyone ages 6 months of age and older stay up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccination;

this includes individuals who are currently eligible to receive an updated (bivalent) vaccine.

They then give lots of outdated quantitative reasons to get boosted

Once again, no change is recommended in COVID-19 vaccination practice

Timing of adverse events

flccc.substack.com/p/reducing-cardiac-risk-after-c…

There are two peak windows for complications

They happen either within a few days, which we think is acute heart inflammation causing myocarditis and then an arrhythmia

And then there are those that complicate around five months later (related to fibrin clots)

Stroke Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines

(March 2022, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular disease)

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8894799/

There are increasing reports of various types of stroke.

Ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after COVID-19 vaccination.

Most of such patients are women under 60 years of age and who had received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine.

Denmark

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56744474

Stopper AZ rollout April, 2021

US, South Africa and European Union

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56733715

Stopped rollout of Johnson & Johnson Covid jab, after reports of blood clotting

British heart foundation

www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-ma…

Is the AstraZeneca vaccine still being used in the UK?

No, the UK government is not ordering future supplies of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine.

Evidence shows that mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, are more effective at boosting protection from Covid-19,

so these vaccines are being recommended for the autumn booster programme.

Secretary-General's remarks at the World Economic Forum

www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2023-01-18/s…

We need cooperation, yet we face fragmentation.

But these are far from the best of times – and the world is far from being united.

Instead, we face the gravest levels of geopolitical division and mistrust in generations – and it is undermining everything.

People aged 15-44: 215 deaths in 2019, increasing to 282 in 2023 (31.2% increase)

People aged 45-64: 1199 deaths in 2019, increasing to 1518 in 2023 (27% increase)

All the numbers as one screenshot below, for readers to easily audit.

Data: Deaths by week, Week 1 2023 compared to pre-COVID-19 years (ODF)

Here’s how the first week of the year compares to pre-COVID average:

Original data released half an hour ago:

he December undercount was last mentioned here 7 days ago. It still has not been corrected, so I’ve E-mailed the relevant department of ONS:

Dear Sarah Caul,

I have been tracking ONS data very closely for about a year and I wrote over 100 blog posts about it. Thanks for the relatively (compared to other countries) rapid data disclosure on deaths per week. Corporate media does not need to lie about the data if it can relay false narratives and spin. That’s why people should not rely on the media; check the data. I go by the data. My Ph.D. was in Medical Biophysics, focusing on statistics.

Political intervention is always a threat. You proudly disclose you’re not subjected to political influence. This is great news.

I rely a lot on (and appreciate) the data you release every Tuesday morning at around 10AM. Hence, the integrity of the data is important to me. Editorialising it and repeating government communication strategies (debunked online) distracts from the core data. So I try to stay away from the textual stuff.

In your last update before Christmas you said clearly (in very large fonts) that there was an undercount, which was presented and contained in the datasheet. I took screenshots of that. 3 updates later, however, this number (undercount) has not been amended/corrected. Can you explain, clarify, rectify this? I wish to know what happened in the start of December when there was an undercount.

Kind regards,

If I receive a reply, I will share the gist of it or the whole thing. Depends on sensibilities. If they do not reply, I will ask again. These people are paid by us to inform us.

AM by no means a germophobe. I never was. Chronic and irrational fear of germs, viruses etc. overlooks the point that microorganisms are everywhere, all the time. But over the past few years it’s undeniable that many people overwhelmed hospitals, as COVID-19 had spread, causing massive fatigue in the NHS. Many GPs and nurses resigned. Many others don’t want to go “in there”. Back in 2020 I had an appointment prospectively scheduled by the NHS, but it took them almost 3 months to actually contact me and ask about a date. I had already forgotten about that by then. There was nothing worth going to anymore. In some contexts, such as cancer screeninings, such delays can be lethal/fatal. To be clear, my appointment was for something very minor, predating the worst of COVID-19. I even gave up on it, seeing that other people needed access to physicians a lot more than I needed it.

The mayhem of COVID-19 never ended. A huge number of Brits died last year. In spite of vaccines? Because of them? Lack of funding for the NHS? Lasting effects of COVID recovery? The government does not even bother investigating. It doesn’t wish to know or doesn’t want us to know.

ONS is still publishing figures about deaths, even if data is missing (according to ONS itself!). The “official” figures in https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/ are a laughing stock. They’re barely even worth citing anymore as they’re incomplete by design. They became like an instrument of government and media propaganda.

Learning for oneself how safe it is to mingle with people, knowing that the health system is mostly unavailable or barely available, just makes sense. Some people aren’t given a choice because as part of their job — their livelihood — they must interact with people. Masks are increasingly being mocked or frowned upon. Distancing isn’t always possible (in some jobs and activities).

2023 is here and the lock-downs soon turn 3. For some of us, limited social contact (physical, in-person) is still a reality, a fact of life. Let’s wait and see what ONS publishes later today (about 3 hours from now). Are excess deaths still going through the roof? Are more deaths “gone missing”?

New:

Video: (until Google removes it)

Description:

Changes of ECG parameters after BNT162b2 vaccine in the senior high school students

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36602621/

Full text link

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813456/

Data collected, December 2021

Published, January 2023

Aims

Determine the ECG parameter change

Determine efficacy of ECG screening after the second dose of BNT162b2

In cooperation with the school vaccination system of Taipei City government (Taiwan)

N = 4,928 (mostly male)

12 to 18 year old

Before and after 12 lead ECGs

Three follow up 12 lead ECGs

ECGs read by by pediatric cardiologists

Serial comparisons of ECGs and questionnaire survey

Heart rate increased significantly after the vaccine,

(mean increase of 2.6 beats per minute)

QRS duration and QT interval decreased significantly after the vaccine with increasing heart rate

763 (17.1%) had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose.

After the first dose, 209 (5.7%) had at least one cardiac symptom

Cardiac symptoms

Chest pain

Palpitations

Dizziness or syncope

Depolarization and repolarization parameters

All 4 cardiac symptoms significantly higher after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (p less than 0.001)

N = 4,928

Abnormal ECGs were obtained in 51 (1.0%)

31 students were asymptomatic

ST – T changes, 37

Premature ventricular contractions, 4

Sinus bradycardia, 2

Atrial tachycardia, 1

Incomplete right bundle branch block, 3

Abnormal QRS, 2

Prolonged QT, 2

4 judged to have significant arrhythmia

1 was diagnosed with mild myocarditis

10, suspected pericarditis

All of these symptoms improved over time

Asymptomatic at one month

No covid in Taiwan at this time.

Conclusion

Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine

Incidences of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis are 0.1%

One in a thousand

Rotavirus vaccine Rotashield, (1999)

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/rotavirus/vac-rotashield-historical.htm

1 to 2 serious events per 10,000 vaccinees

(Intussusception)

Vaccine withdrawn

From the authors

BNT162b2 has a better safety profile than mRNA-1273 Moderna

Cardiac-related adverse effects, as peri- and myocarditis, are of particular concern because of possible serious complications

US vaccina advice

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html#children

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html

CDC recommends one updated (bivalent) booster dose:

• For everyone aged 5 years and older if it has been at least 2 months since your last dose.

• For children aged 6 months–4 years who completed the Moderna primary series and if it has been at least 2 months since their last dose.

UK vaccine advice

Who can get a COVID-19 vaccine

Everyone aged 5 (on or before 31 August 2022) and over can get a 1st and 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

People aged 16 and over, and some children aged 12 to 15, can also get a booster dose.