Introduction About Site Map

RSS 2 Feed RSS 2 Feed

Main Page | Blog Index

Friday, October 21st, 2022, 4:47 pm

Pfizer Refuses to Explain What It’s Selling

Published a couple of hours ago:

Description/outline (as YouTube will likely remove it at some stage):

Pfizer / European commission vaccine contracts, over 100 blanked out pages

This is how they were disclosed to us, (MEP Cristian Terhes)

Over 100 blacked out pages

Full hearing of Pfizer’s representative before the European Commission

My video based on available content at the time

Press conference after Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla refused to answer in front of European Parliament

Six members of the European Parliament held a press conference on October 11, 2022, one day after Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, refused to participate in the Covid committee and answer questions.

MEP Francesca Donato (Italy)

MEP Cristian Terhes (Romania)

MEP Virginie Jeron (France)

MEP Sylvia Limmer (Germany)

MEP Ivan Sincic (Croatia)

MEP Christine Anderson (Germany)

YT guidelines

COVID-19 medical misinformation policy

Prevention misinformation:

Content that promotes prevention methods that contradict local health authorities or WHO.

Claims that there is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19

Claims that any medication or vaccination is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19

Vaccine safety: content alleging that vaccines cause chronic side effects, outside of rare side effects that are recognized by health authorities

Efficacy of vaccines: content claiming that vaccines do not reduce transmission or contraction of disease

Ingredients in vaccines: content misrepresenting the substances contained in vaccines

MEP Virginie Jeron (France)

My colleagues have perfectly summarised the masquerade (farce) of yesterdays meeting

None of the questions we asked, which were very clear;

Contracts, prices, xxxxxx, were not answered.

Pfizer should be required to give evidence under oath

Because this is an official hearing.

This was the biggest contract ever awarded by the European Commission, E 36 billion

European court paper, 35 pages of questions, criticisms, demands, lack of transparency – none answered

Suspicions of passive corruption, to be put into action

I have contacted a legal firm in France

Summary, they came, they did not answer anything, and they are still selling us their products.

Technical Notes About Comments

Comments may include corrections, additions, citations, expressions of consent or even disagreements. They should preferably remain on topic.

Moderation: All genuine comments will be added. If your comment does not appear immediately (a rarity), it awaits moderation as it contained a sensitive word or a URI.

Trackbacks: The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

Syndication: RSS feed for comments on this post RSS 2

    See also: What are feeds?, Local Feeds

Comments format: Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, E-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Back to top

Retrieval statistics: 21 queries taking a total of 0.239 seconds • Please report low bandwidth using the feedback form
Original styles created by Ian Main (all acknowledgements) • PHP scripts and styles later modified by Roy Schestowitz • Help yourself to a GPL'd copy
|— Proudly powered by W o r d P r e s s — based on a heavily-hacked version 1.2.1 (Mingus) installation —|