Saturday, August 29th, 2026, 6:39 pm
Growing Risk, Not Just to Ukraine But to NATO
Filed under: 
do not use social control media, so I cannot be “doomscrolling”, but looking at reputable sites today it looks like NATO-Russia rations are worst than ever, Ukraine says Russia might commence another ground invasion, and even the UK faces growing provocations by Russia, hence the higher perceived risk. That’s based on BBC, The Times, and other large publishers.
“The Cabinet Office campaign will encourage households to prepare for emergencies lasting several days,” a lesser known site says.
A friend has meanwhile explained to me that “1) Russia’s secondary export is petrochemicals, the primary export is propaganda; 2) its GDP is like Italy’s and has been near but not at a breaking point for years; 3) it has not yet drafted the provinces; 4) it is already spread exceedingly thin militarily, but is making progress into converting fully over to a wartime economy; 5) it’s never as strong as it looks but nor is it as weak as it looks (see #1)”
We’re quite well prepared for crisis, but if one’s neighbours are ill-prepared, then it can developed into trouble quite fast.
Further south of Russia there is “one *big* problem,” the friend explained, “especially for S Korea, is if N Korea is paid to establish
large scale manufacturing of munitions, then once there are no external buyers they can simply use it up themselves against S Korea…”
“Data centers are part of the CCP’s attack on the defense of Europe, e.g. “Norwegian company says TikTok data centre is limiting energy for manufacturing Ukraine ammunition”. The Grauniad wrongly spins the problem as one of “cat videos” but those are just the carrier signal for the real payload: destructive propaganda such as car-burning yobs who drive the wrong way down the highways…”
“Propaganda requires a carrier signal to trap people’s attention and provide a false sense of value so that they are paying attention when the real payload is transmitted. The payload can be 1 out of 20 or fewer, as long as the other 19 or so keep the targets engaged and receptive. [Because] psychological warfare = sociology + marketing (basically, at least when getting the targets hooked)…”
