Earlier this month: If You Glorify Violence, Then Some People Will Eventually Do It | The Second Antisemitic Attack in Manchester on October 2nd Came From Brett Wilson LLP (Almost at the Exact Same Time as the First) | Brett Wilson LLP Acting in a Way That We Deem Antisemitic, Disrespectful, and Highly Insensitive | Safety Precautions and Hate Crimes

will say frankly, and upfront, that the accusations aren’t baseless. I firmly believe that all the evidence exists and the facts are on my side.

Highly irresponsible thugs did something really horrible 10 days ago. I won’t be able to comment about it fully until the case is over and other sites have said a lot more earlier today [1, 2]. This blog post will focus on more personal aspects.

10 days ago I wrote to the Court: “It is Yom Kippur today. We will respond to you tomorrow. This is important because we must also add to the bundle about 50 PDFs which will show the need for Adjoining of Case Numbers KB-2024-003529 and KB-2024-001270.”

This is an important message and the timing of the message was not of our own choosing. It was also minutes after a terror attack on a local synagogue.

It matters a lot because our legal advisor is a Jewish man who lived near that synagogue, which they (Brett Wilson LLP) are fully aware of; he went on BBC to say people painted swastikas on his own home. Aside from it, it’s Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year to him, so they basically sent threatening letters to both my wife and I on the equivalent of Xmas Eve at 4:30PM, then a very large number of pages (PDFs to both of us) on the equivalent of 10AM Xmas Day when people are literally fasting for over 24 hours (no water either, so health too is at risk), having always shown mean intent and already attempted to book the Hearing for the equivalent of Boxing Day; they attempted this a long time beforehand, back in January 2025.

How could they not know? I’ll write about this in the future.

And perhaps unintentionally (a subject to be covered another day or year), they also did this type of thing also during a funeral.

They’re not just cruel, they’re reckless and extremely insensitive. We’ll treat this accordingly and report what they did based on the hard evidence.

The SRA will be informed fully of what they did.

Then again, consider the fact they represent alleged sympathisers of Hamas. One client, who commented about October 7 2023 only several days after the attack (as if he wasn’t too sure what to say or whether it was a bad thing), made a public statement tacitly justifying acts of terrorism as a route towards peace.

It is my honest opinion that Brett Wilson LLP is a highly antisemitic firm. I’ve already seen plenty of circumstantial evidence of this. This firm also attracts antisemitic clients.

Earlier this year: Eternal Vigilance

| Always Safety First

T is important to keep free press alive in the UK. Protecting it from hostile forces means making sacrifices, never surrendering to bullies.

As Rianne and I both explained [1, 2], over a year ago we filed lawsuits against the ‘Hulk Hogan of UEFI’, who had done truly horrible things to us and to many others. He promotes and works for monopoly. He defames people who work against monopoly.

Last year he hired aggressors in London (because he’s based in the US) to drown us with about 3,000 of pages of legal papers. Last week they did truly horrible things, which I’ve since explained in my personal blog: If You Glorify Violence, Then Some People Will Eventually Do It | The Second Antisemitic Attack in Manchester on October 2nd Came From Brett Wilson LLP (Almost at the Exact Same Time as the First) | Brett Wilson LLP Acting in a Way That We Deem Antisemitic, Disrespectful, and Highly Insensitive

They now try to force matters by doing what I deem to be borderline hate crimes; and if their client attends in person at some hearing, as security is of utmost importance to us, we must also request special security because he publicly boasts about wanting to hurt and even stab people he dislikes; he also did truly horrible things to my wife, she cannot be in the same room as him. It’s too much risk and his litigation partner (represented by the same lawyers and barrister) was already in prison for strangling women and worse. It’s really bad that journalists in the UK are treated so badly by Brett Wilson LLP’s American clients, who actually did truly horrible things (which I merely reported on).

At the end we’ll pursue reform in the UK; we cannot let the US (“No Kings”, except their President) abuse people in the UK like this.

Last week: If You Glorify Violence, Then Some People Will Eventually Do It | The Second Antisemitic Attack in Manchester on October 2nd Came From Brett Wilson LLP (Almost at the Exact Same Time as the First)

T is not our intention to theorise, but where there is smoke there is usually a fire.

Today we decided to break the silence on this matter, having just reported this matter to the UK High Court.

Brett Wilson LLP did something truly evil to us and we intend to hold it accountable.

As it turns out, we’re not alone, as even clients of Brett Wilson LLP are suing Brett Wilson LLP (“The Lawsuit by Clients of Brett Wilson LLP Against Brett Wilson LLP is Officially On, It is Progressing, The ‘Experts’ Pick Outside Law Firms (RPC and Mills & Reeve) to Spare Them From Litigants in Person”).

Law firms live and die (or thrive/survive/perish) based on the reputation they earn for themselves.

The word “evil” may seem vague, sometimes subjective, but what happened last week isn’t unprecedented (it’s part of a pattern) and that it happened just minutes after a terror attack on a synagogue near to us must be documented. There’s a personal element to this story, so we’ll blog this in the personal site.

Stay tuned for more.

By attacking people on The Day of Atonement

magine our surprise. So the ‘Hulk Hogan of UEFI’ decided to sic his dodgy lawyers at us at a seemingly ‘strategic’ time.

They are very toxic people who tacitly justify terrorism. We were reminded of this just minutes after the terror attack on a synagogue in Manchester, yet they persisted with threats and massive PDFs all day long (since the night before). How would they feel if we did this to them on Xmas Day and moreover on a Xmas Day when they can neither eat nor drink for 25 hours? Yes, it was the equivalent of this.

It would certainly appear like Brett Wilson LLP’s aim is to torture people 1) during the holiest of days (with fasting) and 2) right after terror attacks 2 miles from their home.

We’ll hold Brett Wilson LLP accountable for this.

Today in BBC:

October 2 years ago:

oday I lodged my second-ever complaint with the local Council (Town Hall). I’ve lived in Manchester for over 25 years, so that makes an average of one complaint every ~13 years, which I don’t think is too much of a burden on them. I’m not some vexatious complainant.

My complaint deals with feeding of nature [1, 2]; it would be immoral to prohibit or forbid that, more so without disclosing any relevant laws or selectively enforcing alleged rules.

I ticked the following boxes in my complaint:

• “has done something that compromises or is likely to compromise the impartiality of those who work for, or on behalf of, the Council”
• “has prevented another person from gaining access to information to which that person is entitled to by law”
• “has conducted themselves in a manner that could reasonably be regarded as bringing their office or the Council into disrepute”

A short or preliminary (can be expanded upon later, elaboration upon demand) of the complaint:

I am hereby filing a complaint, without any undue discrimination or ill intent. It is a short complaint the premise of which is, the local authorities are issuing contradictory instructions regarding the feeding of birds in open spaces with grass and trees, as well as providing plenty of fresh water during heatwaves in summertime. Not only us but also neighbours provide food to the birds, which we acquire at personal expense and distribute responsibly so as to avoid remnants being left on the ground. We are receiving contradictory instructions and and those are not based on any law, just ad hoc statements like “please stop feeding pigeons immediately.” (28/08/2025)

Based on official Web sites of the Council and the national authorities alike, there is no legal basis upon which to demand this. Public servants ought not be used for harassment by proxy, more so is the complaints have been doing drugs in their back yard for over a decade (and we never complained). While the issue withstands assessment and scrutiny we shall not refrain from doing the moral thing, which is to feed nature responsibly, just as neighbours do. I already discussed the matter in great length over the telephone on 28/08/2025 (call answered by [redacted]).

To avoid retaliation I prefer for the matter not to be disclosed at this time. The submission reference is #6025138, but I will not disclose any names.

want to explain my position as expressed (or politely, amicably explained) to local authorities.

Animals need water and food, more so in summertime. Especially the water. Water is life, life is water. We bought several stainless steel bowls to nourish the local cats, dogs, birds, and occasionally other animals. We change the water at least once a day to ensure it’s never stagnant. The government and the media actively encourage doing so, more so when there are heatwaves.

In dry places, animals tend to hang out not far from water. It’s an instinctive tendency.

For over a year we had birds in our back yard. This year, to appease thin-skinned people, we moved them to the front, to a public space, an open space with lots of grass and trees.

The queens and kings of Britain have protected wild birds, which they saw as almost equal to humans. The government encouraged people to offer food to birds, e.g. in their back gardens. And because as a society we are governed by rules, not by men, what matters is policy. What it boils down to is the universal rule, so I checked the official .gov sites, just to ensure we feed the birds correctly while complying with whatever it says there.

Over time we reduced the frequency of the feeding (we try to buy them the best seeds available), but not the quantity (once day in large quantities instead of 10-20 times a day in smaller doses), which is fine as long as more people do this. Our neighbours feed them and like them, but there is a resistance from one very malicious couple that does drugs in the back yard, forcing other people to inhale bad stuff for over a decade already. Apparently the birds are “dirty”, but drugs being smoked is not. I recently saw articles about bans on bird-feeding in India (specifically in Mumbai), despite such bans being highly immoral, resulting in actual hunger strikes, albeit mostly by Jains.

We need to resist people who hate and antagonise wild animals, more so knowing that the animals cannot speak to humans (for themselves) and they have feelings too. An act of resistance, wherein you protect the lives of non-human creatures, is nothing to be ashamed of or afraid of.

The pretext that bird-feeding will attract vermin is not supported by any evidence and it also discriminates against some particular animals, who do no harm. If policy changes are to be made, then evidence is needed. While policies remain unchanged it’s not OK to apply any on an ad hoc, improvised basis. When council workers issue contradictory instructions, it then necessarily means somebody is lying.