Crossposted from Tux Machines

When we say “the Tux” we mean Tux Machines

e’re only about two days away from July. The exquisite weather today (cool and sunny) is a fresh breath of air after a week(ish) of heatwave and even bursts of heavy rain last night. I’ve purchased Rianne many boxes of mochi, I’ve begun grinding down the coffee beans, and we’re now in a position to make it a fruitful summer with many editorial pieces, not just curated story picks.

2025 was a busy year for us due to lawfare (we received sound advice), but in 2026 we are catching up and we’ve already made several technical improvements to the site. Our development team enhanced some bits without adding bloat and we’re probably more robust to DDoS attacks this summer (after some attacks crippled us).

We are also grateful for the fact that we forged some new alliances with friendly groups that share similar goals. We help promote them like they help promote us.

Despite what may be claimed online (evil tongues), we have earned a lot of respect in the past few years and made a big leap since the site was 15 (my wife and I became chief curators when the site was 9).

Rianne is still the soul and motor of the site, even if she does not add many original editorials. Behind the scenes there are technical people who keep the site fast and perpetually available, fully patched, properly backed up etc.

AM not sure who is doing this and why, but the server of Tux Machines is under DDoS attack. It impacts Techrights as well. I wrote about this back in April when it began, then again ~3 weeks later.

The Web is so chaotic on so many levels.

CDNs are not the solution. Access gatekeeping with JS is not the solution either, it’s another new problem.

It raised awareness of the very things they were trying to suppress.

N a lot of ways we have already won. What do I mean by that?

Well, first of all, we’re finally going to have our laws rectified, perhaps as soon as later this year.

Second, since we were defiant and ended up making sacrifices for the sake of the nation and for Software Freedom, among many other things such as real computer security (as opposed to American back doors), more people will get involved and are already getting involved.

The cat is out of the bag; lawfare does not always work – it has only backfired spectacularly.

hen I was about 7 Take That was created right here in Manchester, just like Oasis, Simply Red, and many other excellent groups/bands/singers. Take That was modeled after the first so-called “boy band” (in the US) and rose to fame in the 90s. Then something went wrong (people pursuing solo careers, with only “Robbie” becoming the “Beyonce” or “Michael Jackson” or “Justin Timberlake” of the group). In the past 3 nights Take That performed the same old show (“the circus”) that goes back 1.5 decades and last night I could very well hear their performance of “Shine”, followed by fireworks, flares, and colourful smoke. They will be back here for another night on July 1 (Wednesday) and then return to their hiatus (early retirement at age 55).

The limelight (or “fame” more broadly) brings ups and downs because there are highs and lows (sharp contrast apart). One day you’re practising dance routines (choreography) for several months in a row, probably in some basement or small studio, days later you’re “a star” (not for long); it’s not like they spontaneously show up on stage in front of large stadiums and the promotions (marketing) of their concert cost a small fortune, set aside salaries for extras, cost of equipment, security and so on. So the “glory” associated with entertainment – including football – is typically short-lived and temporary. Many of these people end up gaining a lot of weight, doing illegal drugs, even dying young like Ricky Hatton. They brought his dead body to that same stadium only months ago.

As Hatton found out, “fame” is not the thing to strive for; what matters is consistent delivery of something valuable (his rival/friend Manny found out the same thing, then explored inroads or a dabble in national politics to no avail).

When bands perform in their (much) older days hits they had in the 80s and 90s it means they are trying to relive the past instead of offering something new. Very few bands or artists can accomplish this; the inertia is dependent on a cult-like followers’ “base”.

T has been almost 43 years since Richard M. Stallman (“RMS”), “The Last MIT Hacker”, started GNU. He was about 30 at the time and he later quit his job to focus on GNU and avoid a conflict of interest.

I quit my job when I was 40 to focus on various endeavours and I have no regrets; if anything, there’s room to regret not doing so sooner. I could have done and written so much more (had I quit sooner), but at least I saved enough money to defend against lawfare.

Frugal lifestyles have earned credibility (resurgence) as the economies sank, energy became more scarce (or expensive), and political problems more profound. If you’re not seeking to become part of the solution you might be a passive component (or “cog”) of the problem.

The world needs more activists, not more capital.

am turning 45 this year. In December. 45 was the age of Pep Guardiola when he embarked on a new challenge by taking over (not just as head coach but as manager) a club that had potential but not (yet) many trophies and prestige.

45 is an OK age. Not too young, not too old. Not inexperienced, not yet frail.

The final match of “the season” is about to kick off; it’ll be a French winner versus this year’s English leader (based on the PL). There are lots of positive headlines from the Red Devils in Manchester and also from the Blues, though the manager leaving along with key colleagues gives rise to concerns and bittersweet sadness like Alex Ferguson’s departure from the Red Devils, leaving the whole club in “forever limbo” and no very major title (minor trophies only).

They say “life goes on” and after half a decade with Germany’s leading club and years in Spain’s (at the time) leading club he is ready to start a new challenge. Power to him! All the best! We saw him 6 days ago just 50 meters from our home.

To me, the near-term future is clear (I said the same in a blog post when I turned 40); I need to – not only want to – promote Software Freedom and justice. Those two concepts are connected and they also involve journalism, particularly exposing corruption. It’s expensive to do so, but it must be done. If not us, then who? And if not right now, then when?

People who think they can just “tire down” activists are making flawed assumptions about motivation, attribution, attrition, and the power of collective goodwill. We now have barristers again.

So provided one is patient enough, things go one’s way. It just takes a lot of hard work.

Many animals can coexist with many other animals; can humans coexist with other humans?

think it’s fair to say that I can adapt and work with almost anybody. Not everybody, definitely no absolutism here. Regardless of beliefs or nationality, for example, I’ve managed to work with fundamentally different people both personally and professionally. I realise that not everyone can do this, and there are many reasons this can be difficult.

There are still people I cannot have a calm and constructive conversation with, but that typically boils down not to culture but to basic things like nonsensical core. For example, people who judge people based on what car they drive are typically toxic people; people whose whole life is based on reality [sic] TV shows are hard to converse with, even if they’re not obnoxious. It’s just shallow and boring.

It’s probably important for people to assess whether they can get along with many other groups of people. And if not, why not?