HIS site or Weblog is usually more about technology and about scientific endeavors, not politics. But now we’re at risk of a Europe-wide if not worldwide conflict, maybe even nuclear conflict. Thus, “staying out of it” isn’t a tenable position.

I’ve made my position clear on the matter several times over this past week. Mr. Putin has moved on from caring about how the world views his stance on freedom of press and is now suppressing any media to guard what Russians think of Putin’s Russia and its war, no matter the consequences and irrespective of the freedom of the press.

This week I worry about Edward Snowden and what might happen to him in case the US (or EU) captures hostages. Snowden was all along just a high-profile “bargaining chip” of Putin.

The atrocities I read about in media that I trust (and that’s not a lot of media) are beyond the scope of this blog, but Russians I speak to loathe Putin and want him removed. They don’t agree with the war, they suffer greatly in spite of their opposition to Putin, and we need to put an end to it. Putin isn’t likely to step down (it’s just not his mindset), so one can hope that his compatriots at the higher echelons will dissent, rebel, and maybe remove him as part of a coup. This was attempted several times against Hitler. Putin can spare himself the risk by voluntarily stepping down. If only he actually cared about the Russian people, not just his big ego.

Just moments ago:

HE very simple fact is, nobody “wins” wars. Some sides lose less, but everyone loses. In the Second World War, Russia lost by far the most people (Soviets likely suffered the most from the war).

At the moment a lot of people are dying, thousands per day, civilians included. Not to mention harm to nature and buildings, including heritage etc.

Let’s hope that the conflict (war, invasion) will be resolved and end soon. This is the only outcome people ought to aim for. Anything else is dangerous and potentially suicidal.

Suffice to say, oligarchs who don’t participate in (as in join) the army and don’t send their kids there (some of them even profit from weapon sales and/or lending) don’t mind prolonging wars. It doesn’t affect them much. Their stake in the outcome is different from the general population’s (food security isn’t an issue for them). Yes, they also own a lot of the important media, so turn off the TV.

he war in Ukraine needs to end; neither side is going to “win”. Worse yet, the conflict would spill over to other countries.

It’s nice to “pick sides” and cheer, especially when you’re far away, but the perpetuation of current tensions (and rising death toll) will elevate risk.

Choose the side of peace. The aim should be to end this as soon as possible, by diplomatic means if possible. Concessions are likely still possible.

When dealing with nuclear-armed nations there’s no prospect of “defeating” the enemy, only destroying the world.

here’s this stigma or stereotype associated with people who allege that the government, through politicians and state media for the most part, misleads its people. Sure, they typically lie to populations outside the country too. The stigmas or stereotypes are intended to discourage such view being held or publicly expressed. Of course the government does not always lie (absolutism), but oftentimes there’s more incentive to tell supposedly ‘white’ lies.

Over the past few months I’ve covered many examples where both our government and the BBC lied to us, mostly for business reasons.

Governments aren’t in the business of science, mere facts, truth, evidence…

Governments in modern history — even in supposedly civilised nations — act more like front groups of wealthy businesspeople. The politicians are beholden to them.

This does mean we should expect lies; this is especially true at times of war. I’ve decided to archive this old and rusty page, seeing it’s likely to be offline altogether some time in the future and it’s likely Fair Use given the diversity of voices and of course key quotes going centuries back. The underlying HTML looks like something from the 1990s.

Who coined the phrase, “The first casualty of War is Truth”?

Mike Owen, Hebden Bridge UK

• In 1918 US Senator Hiram Warren Johnson is purported to have said: The first casualty when war comes is truth. However, this was not recorded.

  In 1928 Arthur Ponsonby’s wrote: The ‘When war is declared, truth is the first casualty’. (Falsehood in Wartime)

  Samuel Johnson seems to have had the first word: ‘Among the calamities of war may be jointly numbered the diminution of the love of truth, by the falsehoods which interest dictates and credulity encourages.’ (from The Idler, 1758)

  Peter Brooke, Mewmachar Scotland

• The original quote is “The first casualty when war comes is truth”. Hiram W Johnson, staunchly isolationist senator for California, to the US Senate in 1917 (the year of his election to the Senate, where he remained until his death in 1945).
  Philip Draycott, Leicester UK

• …”The first casualty when war comes is truth,” was coined by Hiram Johnson a Republican politician from California who served in the United States Senate for nearly 30 years, beginning in the midst of World War I and concluding with his death in 1945–as it happens, on the same day the U.S. dropped its first atomic bomb on Hiroshima…
  Gareth, Leeds UK

• Rudyard Kipling.
  Paul Hardy, Croydon England

• It has been attributed to both Athur Ponsonby in “Falsehood in Wartime” (1928) and US Senator Hiram Johnson in a 1918 speech. However, the true origin may be in the edition of “The Idler” magazine from 11/11/1758 which says “…among the calamities of war may be jointly numbered the diminution of the love of truth, by the falsehoods which interest dictates and credulity encourages.”
  Andy Ward, LONDON UK

• Hiram Johnson (USA). The full qoute is “The first casualty when war comes is truth”.

  Coincidentally Johnson died on August 6th 1945 (of old age!)

  Kevin Wooldridge, Lowestoft UK

• Boake Carter, an American Radio Reporter. Not sure when though. I seem to remember hearing the original broadcast in a TV origram some time ago.
  Ken Blair, Stirling Scotland

• Hiram Johnson (1866-1945) – a Progressive Republican senator in California. His actual quote, ‘The first casualty, when war comes, is truth’, was said during World War 1. He died on Aug. 6, 1945, the day the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima.
  Gilbert Sharp, Bury St Edmunds UK

• Michael Herr in his book “despatches” based on his experience as a journalist in the Vietnam War.
  Martin Togher, London England

• Aeschylus.
  Joy, Doha Qatar

• In war, truth is the first casualty.
  Aeschylus
  Greek tragic dramatist (525 BC – 456 BC)
  B Smith, Chicago Il USA

• The most fundamental of the Chinese fifth century general Sun Tzu’s principles for the conduct of war is that “All warfare is based on deception”.
  Ed Richardson, Deer Lake, Canada

• Alfred E. Neumann
  David Page, Gatineau, Canada

• Aeschylus
  Frank Olsen, Ringoes United States

• Although frequently attributed to Sun Tzu (544?496 BC), “All warfare is based on deception”; the Sun Tzu quote actually refers to methods of subterfuge in war and goes further to explain, “Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”

  The first corroborated quote reflecting the true essence, almost verbatim is “In war, truth is the first casualty,” attributed to Greek writer/poet Aeschylus (525BC – 456BC).

  Reese, Jeffersonville, IN United States

• “In war, truth is the first casualty”, this quote is from Aeschylus
  Ensar, Dusseldorf, Germany

• Read “the First Casualty” by Philip Knightley – a history of deception in war – it’s all in there.
  John, London

• Aeschylus

  “In war, truth is the first casualty.”

  Susanna Richards, Somerset West, South Africa

• Aeschylus greek tragic dramatist
  525-546 BC
  In war, truth is the first casualty
  Andy, South Boston, Ma USA

• There are now two books that give authoritative answers to these kinds of questions, namely the Yale Book of Quotations and the Dictionary of Modern Proverbs. The latter records that Mrs. Philip Snowden wrote in the Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the National Education Association: “Someone has finely said that ‘truth is the first casualty in war’.” A similar quotation appears in E. D. Morel, Truth and the War (1916). The Dictionary of Modern Proverbs further notes that “Currently the proverb is often attributed to Aeschylus, but the attribution seems to be no older than the 1980s.”
  Fred Shapiro, Bethany, Connecticut USA

• Soooooo many answers…. yet sooooo many of them are wrong, ignorant, and ethnocentrically shortsighted!

  The first to coin such a phrase (and then be PLAGIARIZED by all these other people that you all tout and argue over) was a Greek writer (Dramatist – theatrical arts) named Aeschylus.

  Good job proving the ignorance of the masses (especially since you can learn the etymology of this particular phrase with a little researching online these days… or by GOING TO COLLEGE and taking a dramatic literature course or two!)

  “Ignorance is a disease that can never truly be cured”

  James T., San Diego USA

• Perhaps “James T., San Diego USA” would likely to cite precisely where Aeschylus wrote it. As presently he’s is looking the most ignorant poster here.
  Davey F=Dave, Ickenham England

• This quote was stolen from Aeschylus “In war, the first casualty is truth.” Aeschylus lived from 456 B.C. to 524 B.C
  Jayme Ariss, Shelburne, Canada

• Let’s cut the sniping. Would anyone like to support their arguments by accurately citing the primary source?

  Many thanks,
  Ian.

  Ian Buckingham, Norwich, UK

his past week, across the UK at large, the number of COVID-19 vaccines administered (including “boosters”) was lowest since the tallies began back in January 2021 (source)

Maybe this is what happens when the government gaslights victims and wants people to go “back to the office”. Yesterday I was irked if not irritated by a COVID-19 denier (COVIDiots like to pretend either that it’s “old news” or “fake news”). My mom did what the government said — she went “back to normal” so to speak — and got COVID-19 (she told me yesterday). A pandemic isn’t something you can wish away (in the US they still have ~2,000 deaths in weekdays), as my mom can attest. She took not only one booster but two. And yet, she is taking the real thing very hard. This time it’s an actual potent virus. It’s a real problem and it has already killed many people. It is still killing people. You can see these mortality graphs. “In week 6 2022,” said this latest report (from Thursday), “an estimated 11,558 all-cause deaths were registered in England and Wales (source: Office for National Statistics (ONS)). This is a decrease compared to the 11,862 deaths registered in week 5 2022.” Over 15,000 were dying at the same time last year. So the vaccines did work. They did reduce mortality, overall (all causes combined).

Is this problem over? Hardly!

“From the week of 21 February 2022, the UK Health Security Agency will stop publishing dashboard updates at weekends,” says the official COVID portal of our government. So the regime is trying to sort of ‘wish’ COVID-19 away… because of “the economy”, the precious businessman’s wealth! Notice how few get newly vaccinated for COVID now (it’s like 7k a day). The graphs are flattened almost:

Keep the mask on, keep distance too. Don’t get this virus if you haven’t already. And even if it infected you before, remember it can infect you again. And again… and again.