Monday, April 9th, 2007, 9:06 am
Amusing Viral Videos
Okay, I’m willing to admit that I’ve been watching some videos lately and the following two are worth sharing.
Okay, I’m willing to admit that I’ve been watching some videos lately and the following two are worth sharing.
It’s unlikely that you have not seen this already, but just in case, here’s the summary from the BBC.
Billions of people face shortages of food and water and increased risk of flooding, experts at a major climate change conference have warned.
Full report as PDF, with fragments below.
Settlements in mountain regions will become more susceptible to flooding from glacier-fed lakes. River runoff in fact will increase by 10 to 40 percent in high latitudes and shrink by 10 to 30 percent in the midlatitudes by midcentury. That means a mix of good and bad news for Canada and Russia, but bad news for the Mediterranean. It’s bad for China too, which depends on glaciers to retain its water.
Sea level increases will lead to further coastal erosion.
Droughts and shorter growing seasons will hit Southern Africa and the Sahel region.
Roughly 20 to 30 percent of the plant and animal species on earth will experience an increased risk of extinction if temperatures rise in the expected 1.5-2.5 degree Celsius range.
Shell-forming organisms in the ocean will be impacted in all likelihood by increased acidification.
Deaths from droughts, storms and fires will increase. Deaths from exposure to cold, however, will decline.
[...]
This is the story which reveals how Bill Gates made his company so ‘successful’.
Have a look at this little gem.
The Alternet magazine claims that there is a conspiracy between the big media outfits to kill off or at least damage Google.
It thinks that Viacom’s $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit against YouTube and the recent deal between NBC Universal and News Corp to establish a rival online video site is all part of a cunning plan.
This can’t be confirmed, but it’s probable given Viacom’s recent strike. It seems like Google has become the scapegoat of declining media companies, which increasingly suffer in an age of sharing. They just fear the idea of people generating and viewing their own content. People can legally collaborate on and extend music, video, literature and more. When will companies realise that rivers just run dry owing to disruptive technologies. They should seek alternative revenue streams instead of fighting reality.
Apparently, some people do not mind lying and deceiving on a regular basis as long as they get paid.
“In another case of a government official creating a ‘unique’ interpretation of science, TPM Muckraker reports on Julie MacDonald, deputy assistant secretary for fish and wildlife and parks in the Department of the Interior in Washington. The Department’s Inspector General issued a report today documenting evidence that MacDonald not only overrode opinions of department scientists to benefit lobbyists, and political interests, but also that she shared internal documents with said lobbyists and a friend in an unnamed online roleplaying game…”
The victim is everyone’s environment and wildlife.

The eternal Google cookie leaves room for worries and doubt
A Guardian writer opines that Google’s growth will make it fearsome.
As the world’s biggest search engine starts to compete with old media it risks becoming the ‘Microsoft of the internet’. Richard Wachman reports
OW times are changing. One article which caught my attention suggests that the music industry is evolving from traditional album delivery to singles and ringtones. Can this supply the required revenue? It seems unlikely, but change is inevitable no matter how much they try to rewrite the law and litigate. On the textual publishing side—as opposed to media—yet another giant is giving up on paper distribution. It welcomes nothing but the digital era, which essentially means that its existence will be electronic. Again, revenues and jobs are unlikely to sustain their scale.
Starting next month, InfoWorld readers won’t be waiting for the postman to ring twice. Or even once, for that matter.
The tech publication is ditching its print version and will no longer be distributed via mailboxes, according to a blog posting by the vice president and general manager of Infoworld.com. Instead, the content will solely live online.
Retrieval statistics: 23 queries taking a total of 0.093 seconds • Please report low bandwidth using the feedback form
Original styles created by Ian Main (all acknowledgements) • PHP scripts and styles later modified by Roy Schestowitz • Help yourself to a GPL'd copy
|— Proudly powered by W o r d P r e s s — based on a heavily-hacked version 1.2.1 (Mingus) installation —|