Introduction About Site Map

XML
RSS 2 Feed RSS 2 Feed
Navigation

Main Page | Blog Index

Tuesday, November 6th, 2018, 6:01 pm

Gab is Not a Site That Tolerates Nazis. It is a Nazi Site That Bans People Who Object to Nazism. It’s a Censorship Site With a Dangerous Agenda.

Protecting Nazis from opposing points of views

SEVERAL months ago Gab banned my account which posted GNU/Linux news. It had many followers and said nothing provocative. No explanation was ever given for the ban. Nothing. Not even when asked. Repeatedly. They just zapped the account without warning. Then they pretended nothing happened, hoping nobody would notice that Gab is in fact a censorship platform.

Recently the site was offline for a week after a terror attack. The terrorist maintained a Gab account. Gab kept telling the media that it’s really just standing up for “free speech”, but that’s obviously a lie. It’s a fat lie. Torba is a liar and he knows he’s a liar. He’s just trying to profit from hate.

The site came back online just over a day ago and within a day my personal account got banned. I had many followers (about a thousand) and tens of thousands of gabs (mostly left-leaning and technical stuff). Did I post something obscene or offensive? No. Just some left-leaning news.

One therefore must conclude that the site isn’t just an echo chamber for radicals and sometimes terrorists. It’s a site that actively protects radicals (and sometimes terrorists) from opposing views. And that’s dangerous. Very dangerous. Gab is quickly becoming another Daily Stormer and at one point I received almost a dozen death threats and death wishes in just one day.

Since Gab has proven itself to be a censorship site (even twice in my case alone), it does not have the right to bemoan censorship. If the site is shut down forcibly and permanently, so be it. They cannot complain (calling it “censorship”) because gross censorship is exactly what these people do and we know in whose favour: violent, racist radicals. If you’re not one of them, then that might upset them and sooner or later you might get banned. Permanently.

Wednesday, July 18th, 2018, 7:54 am

Gab Isn’t “Free Speech” But a “Safe Space” for Bigots That Censors Innocent Accounts Without Warning and Without Explanation for the Censorship

I used to complain that Twitter was shadowbanning and suppressing my account. As an act of protest, even though I wasn’t leaning towards the political worldview of most Gab users, I then opened an account there. I later opened another account, one for TuxMachines, in order to separate my GNU/Linux postings from more political ones (some people just want the technical news, not opinions).

The TuxMachines account has been in Gab for a long time, well over a year, and earned hundreds of followers (almost 500 people last I checked). I didn’t post anything controversial and didn’t do anything abusive.

More than half a day ago the account was terminated along with its 10,000+ posts! No prior warning was given and no reason is being given for this. They’re stonewalling. Even some followers of the accounts have enquired about it, but Gab isn’t answering. Curiously enough, as soon as I spoke out about it other people came out stating that they too had been banned by Gab, citing some truly ridiculous reasons.

Make no mistake; Gab isn’t some politically-correct hyper-sensitive site. The site has many accounts of literal Nazis, people who even call for genocides. For some reason, Gab appears to have no issue with such accounts. They cite “free speech”, but as the above comes to show that’s just a facade for tolerating extremely intolerant views, bordering glorification of violence (e.g. lynching black people) and condoning genocide.

Gab cannot really use the “free speech” card (or excuse) to rationalise having that cesspool among its userbase. They use terms like “free speech”, but they don’t actually believe in free speech. It’s a site for “snowflakes” who can’t stand leftist views and ‘gang up’ on those who express such views. Nazis? OK. GNU/Linux news? Get out!

Monday, June 18th, 2018, 6:29 am

Nearly a Decade in Twitter and Half a Million Tweets

Twitter at 500000

Twitter is not a site that I like. Honestly, I don’t! In fact, I think it is getting worse over time. In 2016 it shadowbanned me a lot of times and I receive plenty of abuse there. I now identify as living in the North Pole to avoid messages like “you’re English, so…” (method of shooting the messenger). I only very reluctantly joined Twitter after I had begun participating in identi.ca for the purpose of posting Free software news. Prior to that I preferred just blogging, relying on people who subscribe to RSS feeds to find my writings. At the time there was also Digg.com, which I’m proud to say I was ranked 17th on (they had millions of users at the time). Having taken a quick look at my Twitter account last night, I noticed that a milestone is approached and will have been reached by weeks’s end. I am nowhere near the most prolific users (like 38 million tweets for this Japanese account; see the out-of-date chart below), but quantity was never my goal and besides, as many people know, I primarily post in Diaspora these days, with posts being exported from there to Twitter. I vastly favour these Freedom/Free software-centric communities (like identi.ca at the time and nowadays GNU Social, Diaspora etc.) and I humbly think that all this social control media phenomenon is a waste of human productivity and a threat to real, in-depth, fact-checked journalism. But no single person can tell the world how to use the Internet and how to communicate; if social control media is what’s “normal” and “necessary” now (adapting to the so-called ‘market’), then so be it.

Twitter top users

Monday, June 4th, 2018, 5:19 am

How to Delete Your GitHub Account to Tell GitHub What You Think About Their Decision to Sell Out

IT IS now pretty much confirmed that GitHub has sold out to help Microsoft cause further damage to Free software (FOSS). In a nutshell, Microsoft’s motivation is shallow enough to see:

  1. Microsoft wants to pretend FOSS was never the competition (this causes confusion which serves Microsoft’s bottom line)
  2. Microsoft will lie to officials who sign contracts about being an “open source company” (all of Microsoft’s core software remains proprietary with malicious features like surveillance and DRM)
  3. Buying out, controlling the competition
  4. Patent blackmail, bribery and other attacks on FOSS carry on while Microsoft pretends that all is well (“we come in peace”)

So it’s time to devalue GitHub; it won’t make it any cheaper for Microsoft to buy at this stage (they agreed on the price).

If you have substantial work on the site, migrate away. Here, for example, is how to import your project from GitHub to GitLab.

Then it’s time to delete.

Log in, then enter the following address: https://github.com/settings/admin

Follow these steps:

delete-github-1

delete-github-2

delete-github-3

They then send out an E-mail:


Subject: [GitHub] Account deletion

This email is to confirm that you’ve deleted your account ‘schestowitz’ from GitHub. Your repositories and content have been deleted from the system. If you were on a paid plan, you will not be billed again. We’re sorry to see you go. You can reply directly to this email if you have any questions or feedback, we’d love to hear from you.


Tell others to do the same thing. I will soon urge my wife (when she wakes up) to do the same. Only fools (not her) believe lies like “Microsoft loves Linux”.

Friday, January 19th, 2018, 8:12 am

Detexian Reviewed

I am an early adopter of Detexian, a service which I increasingly rely on for security. My wife and I run a small media entity which attracts about 5 million hits a week. The sites are TuxMachines.org and TechRights.org. One of the sites is modest and non-confrontational, whereas the other one (the latter) is more controversial because it is critical of activities such as bribery, illegal surveillance, and all sorts of corruption. There are certainly people and organisations that are willing to spy on and undermine the site. Some of those who get criticised are large technology companies and institutions they work with.

We cannot keep up with logs because we are a small team and we cannot properly analyse these for security threats. It is just infeasible. For analysis of logs we also require a service which is isolated from surveillance-intensive hosts such as Amazon. We moreover operate on a very small budget as the sites are public services rather than for-profit.

We now rely on Detexian to inspect the traffic and generate concise reports. Detexian helps to avert disaster or alert about troubling patterns in activity before disaster strikes or flaws are found/exploited. TuxMachines.org and TechRights.org are not young sites. They have been around for nearly a decade and a half; over the years we have suffered more DDOS attacks than we can remember and there were also intrusion attempts (none were successful). Some attacks managed to cause damage, but it was always repairable. Recently, Detexian alerted us about SQL injection attempts and made recommendations.

We shall continue to rely on Detexian in the foreseeable future and are happy to pay for the service knowing that someone “has got our back” and is providing informed advice on how to guard the sites.

Monday, January 8th, 2018, 5:22 am

Barrett Brown, Who Received Money From Pierre Omidyar, is Both Rude and Extremely Sensitive

A toxic mix

Barrett Brown

IT is no secret that I have supported Barrett Brown for a number of years. What I underestimated, however, was his temper and willingness to turn against his own supporters. Money from oligarchs does appear to change people.

Monday, December 11th, 2017, 10:56 pm

Dedoimedo Interview About Tux Machines

Original at Dedoimedo

Can you please introduce yourself?

I am a programmer dedicated to promoting the cause of Free software, i.e. control by users of their computers/computing. This cause extends to various different facets because, quite inevitably, Free (or libre) software depends on transparent systems that maximalise cooperation and foster collaboration. This means that, unwittingly, I found myself writing a great deal about more ‘political’ things. I am based in the UK, where the public sector slowly if not begrudgingly adopts Free software.

You run tuxmachines.org, a popular Linux-oriented news site, but you’re not the first (original) owner. How did that come about?

tuxmachines.org is a rather old site (in relative terms), going back to summer of 2004. The site was a go-to source of news back in the days when PCLinuxOS was widely used and topped the DistroWatch charts. I was an early follower of that site because it syndicated a broad range of otherwise-hard-to-find stories about GNU/Linux.

In 2013, for purely personal reasons, the site’s founder put it on sale. She had already begun writing articles for OStatic on a regular basis and was about to remarry.

At the time, my wife and I, working in an IT company, needed to improve our Drupal skills (I had been closely involved with WordPress since 2004 but never Drupal). tuxmachines.org was a Drupal site, so buying the site meant that we would get some additional experience while at the same time carrying the torch for the founder, taking the site in the same direction as before. We did, I believe, maintainer that same spirit and a similar format.

What kind of content do you find engaging? What is the message you seek to share with your audience?

We rarely look at any statistics related to audience or popularity of posts (we also shred logs for privacy reasons), but we’ve found that our audience appreciates our speed. We try to identify and share articles faster than sites like LXer and Linux Today.

There is no particular message we try to convey other than that GNU/Linux is a success story in many areas and it is definitely worth using it.

tuxmachines.org traditionally favoured reviews of distributions and focused on the desktop; we do prioritise such material.

What’s your favorite Linux distro? Why?

I try to think not in terms of distributions anymore; I prefer to focus on the software and the desktop environments (if any are in use). The role of the distribution these days has more to do with package management, including patches, and the selection of available (pre-compiled) software. So I don’t have any particular favorites, though I typically suggest, based on one’s experience level, a distribution with access to extensive repositories like Debian’s.

And what’s your favorite desktop environment?

I currently use 3: GNOME Shell, KDE, and plain Openbox (as minimalist as I can make it due to lack of RAM). I use these in tandem on 3 laptops. My wife prefers Unity, but she used KDE for years.

I’ve been a huge KDE fan for many years (since I was a teenager when I also dabbled in Enlightenment for development), but in recent years it gave me some angst.

At the moment I feel somewhat ‘orphaned’ when it comes to desktop environments. At least I’ve become familiar with most. What matters a lot more is the software in use, not icons and menus associated with window management.

If you had infinite powers and unlimited budget, is there anything you’d change about Linux?

On the desktop, unfortunately, there has been neglect. The Linux Foundation does not seem to care, core Linux developers are sufficiently happy with their ‘geeky’ utilities on their desktop/laptop, and no company — not even Canonical which now focuses on server revenues — puts in enough effort to make GNU/Linux dominant on desktops/laptops. That is somewhat of a travesty.

On mobile devices, the dominant platform is now Android. It fosters DRM, favours proprietary “apps” (that’s the new buzzword for software), monetises mass surveillance, and leaves out GNU. Some believe that Google will also drop Linux and replace it with another kernel — one with a more ‘convenient’ (to Google) licence. Chrome OS is more of the same.

With enough (or “unlimited” as you say) budget we could get enough developers to work solely on the desktop and hire people to spread GNU/Linux through retail channels. A lot of people sadly underestimate the role of Microsoft blackmail, bribes etc. in ensuring that GNU/Linux is kept away from the public eye while thoroughly demonised in the media. I probably don’t have to tell you what happened in Munich; the real story, not the sanitised one.

That said, in your opinion, what are the three most prominent, innovative or successful projects in the Linux world?

I would say Firefox has been very “prominent” to GNU/Linux, even though it is a cross-platform application. It really opened up the Web to GNU/Linux users after that dark age of MSIE-only Web sites.

Regarding “innovative”, I always thought KVM was quite innovative. At the time of its rise to prominence many people relied on large bits of software for virtualisation, often proprietary.

When it comes to “successful”, different people measure “success” in different ways. To some people the number of users indicates “success”, to others it’s all about money. To me, personally, freedom matters a lot and I think GNU succeeded at getting people to grasp the value of having freedom all the way down to the core. Without GNU we would likely have had a “Linux” without the GPL and maybe without Free software, just a bunch of proprietary things on top (e.g. Adobe Reader and VMware).

A birdie tells me you’re down with privacy and freedom issues in the wider software world. Can you elaborate on that?

About a decade ago I became more interested in the effect of software on various things in the world. I’m not talking only about ethics but also self-determination (for persons, organisations, and nations). Think of activists, journalists, and transparency ‘guerrillas’ like those who shed light on power/wealth.

Over a decade ago I already wrote about back doors; it wasn’t a fashionable topic at the time. People would rush to use labels like “paranoid” when the subject was brought up.

Now we know better. Richard Stallman got his vindication. If you don’t control the program, then the program controls you, and many business model these days revolve around reading the minds of users and selling information about them.

Should I call you Doctor? Or?

Everyone just calls me Roy. I have a Ph.D., but the only reason I use my title (sometimes) is to discourage endless personal attacks, typically over my views. Recently, for similar reasons, I also hid the fact that I’m from Manchester, as some people would rather argue in an ad hominem fashion (your opponent’s location, credentials, gender etc.) than substance of the argument/s.

What’s a day in life in Roy’s … uh … life?

I sleep about 6 hours a night, I work full time, and in the remainder of the time it’s Internet and gym/spa. I’m actually quite tight with time, even in the weekends. My only real ‘escape’ or ‘distraction’ is football (we have decent clubs here).

In the morning I catch up with news published overnight, I then write some articles in Techrights (mostly regarding software patents and EPO these days), then it’s back to news and if time permits I go beyond FOSS/Linux and also touch on issues like the environment, politics, economics and so on. I watch issues pertaining to privacy, secret agencies and censorship every day regardless of time constraints. I think these are growingly important (and troubling) matters no matter where we are.

I find the contemporary software development practices and fads rather dubious. What’s your take on the 2017 world of software?

It frustrates if not disgusts me that many buzzwords now dominate the “scene”. And we’re collectively told to alter our résumés accordingly.

“Cloud”, “DevOps”, “IoT”, “Agile”, “Smart”, “Serverless” and so on… you know what I mean, especially as you know that none of these are truly novel. They’re marketing terms and I suspect they’re crafted to make us — mere ‘consumers’ — not think of moral issues, including security and privacy.

What’s your favorite comic strip?

It changes over time, but Dilbert usually strikes a nerve and isn’t “tl;dr” unlike some other comics.

What do you think Linux does well?

Ethics and trust. We live in a world where large corporations constantly lie to us, e.g. regarding privacy. Only yesterday I saw a report about Google harvesting locational information even when users toggle “location” off.

What does Linux need to improve?

I personally think we need a broader debate about GNU philosophy and incorporation of technology along those lines (including the UNIX/POSIX mindset). This also means a departure from monolithic designs. The more I read about and experience systemd (servers and desktops), the more I worry about it.

Where do you think Linux is headed? What will happen in 2025?

8 years is a very long time in technology terms, more so in software terms where the pace of innovation is huge.

Being a pessimist by nature (to keep expectations low and avoid disappointment), I’d say Linux will ‘vanish’ into the so-called ‘cloud’ and people will just have ‘smart’ gadgets all around the house (Linux at the core), transmitting plenty of personal data to the (Linux-powered) ‘serverless’ ‘Cloud Native’ ‘G’ thing (or Amazon thing).

You can rely on technology moving in the direction of capital and when much of the capital is distributed to/through the military it’s not surprising that UEFI restricted boot is becoming the norm, DRM is becoming an integral part of the Web, and Free software like Kodi is being described as “piracy”.

Do you use non-Linux operating systems?

No. Our house is all Linux. Even the gadgets. I still have (and sometimes use) a Palm PDA though. It’s old, but it still works, and sometimes older is better (e.g. for privacy and simplicity).

Do you have a role model?

Some people inspire me, but no role model. I’ve always said it’s risky to idolise people rather than underlying causes because people can betray or let you down. Causes have no moods are are harder to corrupt. No need to personify them.

Anything else?

We live in Orwellian times with divisive leaderships and technology that’s designed to oppress us. If we remain apathetic and passive, we will pay a high price in our lifetime, so certain so-called ‘novelty’ can be rightly rejected. Free software may be our only chance at antagonising regressions.

Real-time Posts



Retrieval statistics: 23 queries taking a total of 0.183 seconds • Please report low bandwidth using the feedback form
Original styles created by Ian Main (all acknowledgements) • PHP scripts and styles later modified by Roy Schestowitz • Help yourself to a GPL'd copy
|— Proudly powered by W o r d P r e s s — based on a heavily-hacked version 1.2.1 (Mingus) installation —|